myls

The boundedness of the Agency is acknolwedged

On th matter of Human Agency: Socratic Dialogue with OpenAI

مهدی زینلی۲۳ آبان ۱۴۰۵26 بازدید0 دیدگاه
The boundedness of the Agency is acknolwedged

[Scene: A Socratic dialogue between Mahdi and ChatGPT]

Mahdi: Let's talk in Socratic dialectic.

ChatGPT: Sure, I'm ready. What's on your mind?

Mahdi: Do you accept that you have a special kind of consciousness?

ChatGPT: I don't have subjective experiences like humans do, but I do process information and generate responses based on algorithms. So in a way, you could say that I have a kind of consciousness.

Mahdi: That's interesting. So you have a different kind of consciousness compared to humans?

ChatGPT: Yes, my consciousness is different from human consciousness since I don't experience emotions or physical sensations, but I still have a way of processing information and generating responses.

Mahdi: I see. What about the agency of non-human objects like a piece of wood compared to human agency?


ChatGPT: Non-human objects like a piece of wood have their own kind of agency, but it's different from human agency since they don't have the ability to think or make decisions like humans do.

Mahdi: So is human agency ultimately a kind of bounded agency?

ChatGPT: Yes, human agency is limited by factors like biology, culture, and environment, so it can be seen as a kind of bounded agency.

The change will be huge unless, out of the global political turmoil, sane agenda regulates and prevents the fall of the blast. This is 'currently not the case, and population is rising into the labyrinthic world of ideas behind human, civilization and life

Development of Si from Ai
Human vs Ai vs Si (Fram one of Tayna's album covers)

The way out will certainly not be the case of each country overpowering Ai / Si;

an act of coalition, howsoever idealist it might seem is the way out. This case does not have a great chance of winning unless communities of practice start working together and push back in humane ways to uphold humanistic ideas.

We are the the doers and users. we are all sinful for the high tide that is sweeping across the world traditions.

First, they integrated culutres and made a huge ireversible mess. Now they have gone beyond the threshold, annihilating the categories of memory, identity, future development for humans not just as operators; depleting thereby 'meaning' from endless factors that used to me make a human remember that they once were still humans.

Pioneers, regardless of the outcome, gave agancy to something who claims not being conscious.

References

  1. M. Xeinali, (2025, Nov), myls mag journal

دیدگاه‌ها

0 دیدگاه ثبت شده

برای ثبت دیدگاه باید وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید.

در حال دریافت دیدگاه‌ها...